blob: b630b10d06695234375320ff3f82c81a442231bd (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
|
;;; ccwl --- Concise Common Workflow Language
;;; Copyright © 2021, 2022 Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
;;;
;;; This file is part of ccwl.
;;;
;;; ccwl is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
;;; under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
;;; the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
;;; (at your option) any later version.
;;;
;;; ccwl is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
;;; WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
;;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
;;; General Public License for more details.
;;;
;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
;;; along with ccwl. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
(use-modules (rnrs conditions)
(rnrs exceptions)
(srfi srfi-1)
(srfi srfi-64)
(srfi srfi-71)
(ccwl conditions)
(ccwl utils))
(define plist-ref
(@@ (ccwl utils) plist-ref))
(test-begin "utils")
(test-equal "pairify"
'((1 . 2) (3 . 4) (5 . 6))
(pairify (list 1 2 3 4 5 6)))
(test-equal "plist-ref"
2
(plist-ref (list #:spam 1 #:ham 2 #:eggs 3)
#:ham))
(test-equal "plist-ref with absent key"
#f
(plist-ref (list #:spam 1 #:ham 2 #:eggs 3)
#:foo))
(test-equal "group-keyword-arguments"
'(#:spam 1 #:ham (1 2 3) #:eggs (0))
((@@ (ccwl utils) group-keyword-arguments)
(list #:spam 1 #:ham 1 2 3 #:eggs 0)
(list #:spam)))
;; We cannot use test-equal to compare syntax objects, since
;; test-equal does not preserve the lexical contexts of the test
;; expressions.
(test-assert "unsyntax-keywords"
(equal? (list #:ham #'1 #:eggs #'2)
((@@ (ccwl utils) unsyntax-keywords)
(list #'#:ham #'1 #'#:eggs #'2))))
(test-equal "lambda**"
'(1 2 123 (1 2 3))
((lambda** (a b #:key foo #:key* bar)
(list a b foo bar))
1 2 #:foo 123 #:bar 1 2 3))
(test-equal "lambda** with default values"
'(1 2 123 9 (321 456) (7) (3 2 1))
((lambda** (foo aal #:key vale (pal 9) #:key* naal (irandu 7) (sol 3 2 1))
(list foo aal vale pal naal irandu sol))
1 2 #:vale 123 #:naal 321 456))
(test-equal "default default value of lambda** unary argument should be #f"
#f
((lambda** (#:key foo)
foo)))
(test-equal "default default value of lambda** n-ary argument should be the empty list"
'()
((lambda** (#:key* foo)
foo)))
(test-assert "lambda** should raise an &unrecognized-keyword-assertion on unrecognized keywords in arguments with syntax objects as irritants"
(guard (exception
(else (and (unrecognized-keyword-assertion? exception)
;; We check with NOT keyword? because we have no
;; way of directly checking for syntax?.
(not (any keyword? (condition-irritants exception))))))
(macroexpand
'(lambda** (#:key foo #:foo bar)
foo))))
(test-equal "Allow other keys in lambda**"
1
((lambda** (#:key foo #:allow-other-keys)
foo)
#:foo 1 #:bar 2))
(test-assert "Unrecognized keyword argument passed to lambda** should raise an &unrecognized-keyword-assertion condition"
(guard (exception
(else (unrecognized-keyword-assertion? exception)))
((lambda** (spam ham #:key eggs)
spam)
1 2 #:foo 123)))
(test-assert "Unary lambda** keyword argument passed multiple arguments should raise an &invalid-keyword-arity-assertion condition"
(guard (exception
(else (invalid-keyword-arity-assertion? exception)))
((lambda** (spam ham #:key eggs)
(list spam ham eggs))
1 2 #:eggs 123 345)))
(test-assert "Wrong number of positional arguments to lambda** should raise an &invalid-positional-arguments-arity-assertion condition"
(guard (exception
(else (invalid-positional-arguments-arity-assertion? exception)))
((lambda** (spam ham #:key eggs)
spam)
1 #:eggs 123)))
(test-assert "syntax-lambda**"
(equal? (list #'1 #'2 #'123 (list #'1 #'2 #'3))
((syntax-lambda** (a b #:key foo #:key* bar)
(list a b foo bar))
#'1 #'2 #'#:foo #'123 #'#:bar #'1 #'2 #'3)))
(test-assert "syntax-lambda** with default values"
(equal? (list #'1 #'2 #'123 9 #'(321 456) '(7) '(3 2 1))
((syntax-lambda** (foo aal #:key vale (pal 9) #:key* naal (irandu 7) (sol 3 2 1))
(list foo aal vale pal naal irandu sol))
#'1 #'2 #'#:vale #'123 #'#:naal #'321 #'456)))
(test-equal "default default value of syntax-lambda** unary argument should be #f"
#f
((syntax-lambda** (#:key foo)
foo)))
(test-equal "default default value of syntax-lambda** n-ary argument should be the empty list"
'()
((syntax-lambda** (#:key* foo)
foo)))
;; We cannot use test-equal to compare syntax objects, since
;; test-equal does not preserve the lexical contexts of the test
;; expressions.
(test-assert "Allow other keys in syntax-lambda**"
(equal? #'1
((syntax-lambda** (#:key foo #:allow-other-keys)
foo)
#'#:foo #'1 #'#:bar #'2)))
(test-assert "syntax-lambda** should raise an &unrecognized-keyword-assertion on unrecognized keywords in arguments"
(guard (exception
(else (unrecognized-keyword-assertion? exception)))
(macroexpand
'(syntax-lambda** (#:key foo #:foo bar)
foo))))
(test-assert "Unrecognized keyword argument passed to syntax-lambda** should raise an &unrecognized-keyword-assertion condition with syntax objects as irritants"
(guard (exception
(else (and (unrecognized-keyword-assertion? exception)
;; We check with NOT keyword? because we have no
;; way of directly checking for syntax?.
(not (any keyword? (condition-irritants exception))))))
((syntax-lambda** (spam ham #:key eggs)
spam)
#'1 #'2 #'#:foo #'123)))
(test-assert "Unary syntax-lambda** keyword argument passed multiple arguments should raise an &invalid-keyword-arity-assertion condition"
(guard (exception
(else (and (invalid-keyword-arity-assertion? exception)
;; We check with NOT keyword? because we have no
;; way of directly checking for syntax?.
(not (any keyword? (condition-irritants exception))))))
((syntax-lambda** (spam ham #:key eggs)
(list spam ham eggs))
#'1 #'2 #'#:eggs #'123 #'345)))
(test-assert "Wrong number of positional arguments to syntax-lambda** should raise an &invalid-positional-arguments-arity-assertion condition"
(guard (exception
(else (invalid-positional-arguments-arity-assertion? exception)))
((syntax-lambda** (spam ham #:key eggs)
spam)
#'1 #'#:eggs #'123)))
(test-equal "filter-mapi"
'(1 3 5 7 9)
(filter-mapi (lambda (item index)
(and (even? index)
(1+ item)))
(iota 10)))
(test-equal "mapn"
'((0 1 4 9 16)
(0 1 8 27 64))
(let ((squares cubes (mapn (lambda (n)
(values (expt n 2)
(expt n 3)))
(iota 5))))
(list squares cubes)))
(test-equal "append-mapn"
'((0 0 1 1 2 4 3 9 4 16)
(0 0 1 1 2 8 3 27 4 64))
(let ((squares cubes (append-mapn (lambda (n)
(values (list n (expt n 2))
(list n (expt n 3))))
(iota 5))))
(list squares cubes)))
(test-equal "foldn"
'(45 285)
(let ((sum sum-of-squares
(foldn (lambda (n sum sum-of-squares)
(values (+ sum n)
(+ sum-of-squares (expt n 2))))
(iota 10)
0 0)))
(list sum sum-of-squares)))
(test-end "utils")
|
